Showdown: Google+ Vs Facebook

Showdown: Google Vs Facebook +

Many prefer Facebook to Google + +, but I think Google is based on the best technology and the potential gap certainlyhas Facebook. I decided to go ahead and write in a clash on some issues between Facebook and Google +.

Design

Winner: Google +

Google is so serious that Google + redesigned all of its services, including the recent Google Reader, to make the interface consistent and smooth. Apart from this navigation bar Google also adds to the seamless integration of Google + with other Google services. + Google makes great use of the images' EXIF ​​data, while using theater-like effects to photos used by Facebook. It also has a nice way to manage settings, and automatic updates, cache shared links, "which shows how Googlers have taken care in designing Google +.

Besides all this, I think, "following followers" than the old method of process "friending."

On the other hand, I like the design too much on Facebook, mainly because I do not like too much white space as Google + display. But the crowded about the design of Facebook is the turn-off a few.

Another problem is that Facebook has problems when they overhaul, as their function the most recent schedule profile is not available, even after a month and a half after its announcement.

Privacy

Winner: Google +

Facebook has a reputation for selling user information to organizations, but there is no evidence to prove it. I've never seen user feedback. For example, people have requested an option to consider tags a long time before finally being released. People can add friends to all groups that want and is irritating, but the people of Facebook never really talked about it.

New features such as Facebook and Facebook stalkers Ticker Chronology encourage. Nik Cubrilovic, an Australian developer has recently been an interesting argument that Facebook tracks users even after the disengagement, which came to be true.

Google + HTTPS is enabled by default, the circles can be edited and managed in a better way that the lists of Facebook, which is dominated by many Facebook users.

Interaction

Winner: Facebook

We can not deny that Facebook was the one who brought the relationship to the Internet, and continues still. Although features like Facebook Ticker is an intrusion of privacy for some users, many of them, it is a better way to interact with their friends. Applications such as Spotify, WAPO social Reader is more social than before.

A feature wish Google + page is missing is the brand for many companies, large and small, Facebook is the best way to interact with customers, such is the popularity of Facebook Pages. Questions and Facebook groups, on the other hand, can be used to crowd source opinions easily.

The best of the world on Facebook? The members. Yes, the problems of people, Google + is not dead, but not as active as Facebook. In fact, while I emptied Facebook Google +, but then I reactivated Facebook, really, because there is much talk of + Google.

Google + maybe 40 million users were registered on Facebook has 800 million active users. So Facebook is king, when the interaction is concerned.

Chat

Winner: Google +

For me, the best feature remains the Google places of residence. It 'really awesome, and I think that if Google has changed its stand-alone app so it would be the beginning of all the app stores out there.

"Places of assembly with extras" The new Google + not only can video chat and voice chat group, but you can also do screen sharing, work on a document together with his colleague (with Google Docs integration) scribbles on sketches, and more.

In Facebook, all you can do - 12:59 video chat, no more than that. Also the chat feature works, buggy and inconsistent.

Final Note

So as you can see, Google + is the winner of the duel this week.

For many of them, Google + is too professional, and I agree that to some extent. They need to run the property, things like Facebook, social networking applications that are interactive, so I do not want to be another Google + LinkedIn. Sure, there's not much buzz Google +, but surely it takes time to create some of my opinions. Be sure to read this excellent article by Robert Scoble that Google is going to +.

On the other hand, Facebook needs better technology, one of the main reasons why Facebook continues to rule the world of social networks, people resist change. But change is inevitable and will depend on whether the change or Facebook people can change their choice of a social network.